Topic summary
92%2 analyzed articles/videos2,339 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maternity Care results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.1% saturation with 2,395 hits. Analysis detected 9,385 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,017 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 66% (5,408 of 15,689 topics). This Maternity Care is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group.
Maternity Care
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,017
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.5% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 34.1%34.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.4%19.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 23.1%23.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 34.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos