Topic summary
93% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,988 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mass Shootings results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 2,587 hits . Analysis detected 17,242 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,994 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (6,370 of 16,562 topics). This Mass Shootings is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Mass Shootings
Topic details
Total words: 9,994
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.5% percentile 3.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 25.9% 25.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 7.0% 7.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 25.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Red Herring: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst