Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Marino results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 827 hits. Analysis detected 5,823 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,801 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,598 of 6,263 authors). This Joe Marino is worse (more manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group.
Joe Marino
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
59%Joe Marino (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,801
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510058.5% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 7.2%7.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.3%14.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.9%9.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate