Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Marino results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 827 hits . Analysis detected 5,823 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,801 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,598 of 6,263 authors). This Joe Marino is worse (more manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group. Joe Marino
Author details
Total words: 5,801
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.5% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.2% 7.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.3% 14.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.9% 9.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst