Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 664 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr. Marc Siegel results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 661 hits . Analysis detected 4,638 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of 93% (510 of 6,628 authors). This Dr. Marc Siegel is worse (more manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group. Dr. Marc Siegel
Author details
Total words: 1,992
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.3% percentile 8.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 33.2% 33.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 29.4% 29.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 16.7% 16.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 14.7% 14.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.1% 19.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.0% 9.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Author 33.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 29.4%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Author 19.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 16.7%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.1%, sitewide 15.9% Begging the Question: Author 14.7%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 14.0%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.0%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.4% Special Pleading: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Personal Incredulity: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst