Topic summary
71%4 analyzed articles/videos571 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marvel Cinematic Universe results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 786 hits. Analysis detected 6,539 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,829 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (9,126 of 16,562 topics). This Marvel Cinematic Universe is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Marvel Cinematic Universe
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.5%13.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate