Deadline27%

'Spaceballs: The New One' Parodies Marvel Panels at Comic-Con 5%

By Dessi Gomez1% Anthony D'Alessandro42%

7/24/2026, 5:36:01 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 350 faulty-reasoning hits from 571 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 20.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (20,843 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.20% of the article peer group.

Just like the beginning of the original Spaceballs, which went really big in that long opening spaceship take that made fun of Star Wars, so did Amazon MGM Studios in its Hall H presentation Friday of Spaceballs: The New One. 
A la the studio’s presentation of Project Hail Mary last year, they blew open the 180-degree wrap-around screens for the new Mel Brooks movie in what was the ultimate Comic-Con parody: A hysterical send-up of the Marvel Cinematic Universe's phase timeline from their 2019 and 2022 presentations. 
“We’d make a really weird Blade,” the sequel’s writer, producer and star Josh Gad joked later on during the panel in response to an audience's question. 
“But maybe it would finally get made.” 
At first, returning star Rick Moranis, aka Dark Helmet, could not be found in the room, until the camera discovered him disguised in a group of fans wearing the character's helmet. 
The former McKenzie Brother stood up and received a standing ovation. 
“Rick is underselling it,” Gad joked. 
“They’re announcing him as part of the X-Men cast tomorrow.” 
Gad shouted out Moranis as “one of the four men on my comedy Mount Rushmore. 
Another one of them is John Candy. 
This movie is really a love letter to him. 
I am not playing Barf in this movie. 
I am playing a new mog in our movie. 
John is at the beating heart of this film and the reason why this movie has so much heart. 
I hope when you see it you will agree.” 
The 100-year old Brooks beamed in with a message, “Sorry I can't be with you. 
I’m on the convention floor trying to buy a rare Charizard card. 
When I was your age, on a Friday, I would go to something called work,” he joked. 
“From the bottom of my heart I wanna say, thank you, nerds.” 
Brooks returns as the almighty Yogurt in the sequel. 
Bill Pullman (aka Lone Starr in the film, the Han Solo cut-up) also beamed in this evening, saying he was “tracking down a rare Charizard card in the UK.” 
However, Pullman's son Lewis, who plays his on-screen son Starburst in the movie, was on the panel and called his dad’s work “unfillable.” 
Lewis Pullman shared his least favorite scene in the original Spaceballs, “When Barf knocks my dad’s cowboy hat off. 
I remember being too young to understand that the hat didn’t just fall into the abyss of space. 
This whole movie's about him trying to get his damn hat back.” 
“For a while I had real beef with Barf,” added the young Pullman. 
Brooks' sense of humor is historically politically incorrect (read Blazing Saddles), so how does that get by in this fierce Trumpian era? 
Will Spaceballs 2 avoid controversy? 
“It's all about the laughs, Mel always said,” according to the sequel's director Josh Greenbaum. 
Added Moranis, “There’s room in a Mel Brooks movie for the smartest joke you’ve ever thought of and the dumbest one.” 
The clip shown in the room today was longer than one at CinemaCon, which showed Brooks as Yogurt, Keke Palmer and Lewis Pullman's characters on the adventure, Daphne Zuniga as Princess Vespa, and culminating with an Avatar Na’vi entering the men's room and taking to the urinal. 
(The trailer won’t be releasing today, we understand.) 
Spaceballs: The New One blasts off in theatres on April 23. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.2%Dessi Gomez: 1.3%Deadline: 2.4%Confirmation Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Dessi Gomez: 3.2%Deadline: 6.5%Framing Effect7.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Dessi Gomez: 0.6%Deadline: 6.7%Negativity Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 2.1%Dessi Gomez: 0.3%Deadline: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias2.1%This article: 2.6%Dessi Gomez: 0.4%Deadline: 0.6%In-Group Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Dessi Gomez: 0.8%Deadline: 6.1%Halo Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.6%Dessi Gomez: 0.4%Deadline: 3.9%Appeal to Authority2.6%This article: 4.7%Dessi Gomez: 0.7%Deadline: 0.9%False Dilemma4.7%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 3.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.6%Dessi Gomez: 0.2%Deadline: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion1.6%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 1.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.6%Dessi Gomez: 0.6%Deadline: 2.9%Unattributed Quote2.6%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 15.2%Dessi Gomez: 3.9%Deadline: 6.7%Biased Writer Voice15.2%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 0.0%Deadline: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Dessi Gomez: 1.2%Deadline: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Dessi Gomez: 0.6%Deadline: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias3.9%This article: 1.9%Dessi Gomez: 0.8%Deadline: 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.9%

571 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers58%attributed speech240writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 100.0% coverageJosh Gad • 26 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Gad • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Gad • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Gad • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Gad • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Gad • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Gad • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Gad • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Gad • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Gad • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Gad • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMel Brooks • 15 words • 100.0% coverageMel Brooks • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMel Brooks • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMel Brooks • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageBill Pullman • 29 words • 0.0% coverageLewis Pullman • 23 words • 0.0% coverageLewis Pullman • 19 words • 0.0% coverageLewis Pullman • 18 words • 0.0% coverageLewis Pullman • 12 words • 0.0% coverageLewis Pullman • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Greenbaum • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Moranis • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Josh Greenbaum

100%flagged-word coverage
15 attributed words4.5% of attributed speech52% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-36.3 ptsWriter: 36.3%Josh Greenbaum: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -9.2 ptsWriter: 9.2%Josh Greenbaum: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.6 ptsWriter: 4.6%Josh Greenbaum: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.