Topic summary
⁠76%3 analyzed articles/videos1,791 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manosphere results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 2,399 hits. Analysis detected 13,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,503 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,695 of 16,562 topics). This Manosphere is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Manosphere
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,503
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510059.6% percentile
3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 25.2%25.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.1%18.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.9%7.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos