Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Lyz Lenz results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 790 hits. Analysis detected 4,973 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,613 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,348 authors). This Lyz Lenz is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Lyz Lenz
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Lyz Lenz (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,613
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 30.2%30.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 30.2%30.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 22.0%22.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 20.4%20.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.1%13.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.5%10.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Author 30.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 30.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 20.4%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 22.0%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos