Topic summary
⁠25%5 analyzed articles/videos5,711 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Love results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 4,306 hits. Analysis detected 21,651 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,586 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (15,700 of 16,562 topics). This Love is better (less manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

5% percentile
02550751005.2% percentile
1.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles34.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos