Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Samantha Ross results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 589 hits . Analysis detected 2,267 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,363 authors). This Samantha Ross is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Samantha Ross
Author details
Total words: 2,436
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 24.2% 24.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Author 24.2%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst