Topic summary
⁠43%3 analyzed articles/videos3,247 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Local Dining results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 1,452 hits. Analysis detected 9,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,816 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,718 of 16,562 topics). This Local Dining is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Local Dining
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,816
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.4%13.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos