Topic summary
44%2 analyzed articles/videos2,406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These LGBTQ Culture results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 1,288 hits. Analysis detected 12,625 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,091 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,579 of 16,562 topics). This LGBTQ Culture is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
LGBTQ Culture
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 14,091
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.1%9.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos