Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Levine results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,118 hits. Analysis detected 9,625 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,331 of 6,628 authors). This Nick Levine is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Nick Levine
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
35%Nick Levine (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,676
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

35% percentile
025507510034.7% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.4%6.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.2%0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos