Author summary
55% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,887 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathan Dalton results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 1,039 hits . Analysis detected 4,494 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,661 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,111 of 6,359 authors). This Nathan Dalton is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group. Nathan Dalton
Author details
Total words: 5,661
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.1% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 18.4% 18.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 18.4%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst