Topic summary
35% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,286 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legislative Process results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,923 hits . Analysis detected 13,357 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,952 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (14,691 of 15,780 topics). This Legislative Process is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group. Legislative Process
Topic details
Total words: 18,952
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.9% percentile 1.5% BS Score8 analyzed articles19K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst