Topic summary
6% 8 analyzed articles/videos 6,744 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legionnaires Disease Outbreak results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 1,034 hits . Analysis detected 9,901 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,745 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (15,490 of 15,690 topics). This Legionnaires Disease Outbreak is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group. Legionnaires Disease Outbreak
Topic details
Total words: 23,745
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.3% percentile 1.1% BS Score8 analyzed articles23.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst