Gothamist77%

UES Legionnaires' disease cluster has hospitalized 17, but no deaths yet, officials say 10%

By Caroline Lewis38%

7/7/2026, 9:23:02 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Slippery Slope, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 439 faulty-reasoning hits from 528 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.8% and a BS Rank of 10% (19,783 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the article peer group.

The Legionnaires’ disease outbreak on Manhattan's Upper East Side has hospitalized 17 people so far  the majority of the 23 who have tested positive for the severe form of pneumonia since the disease cluster was identified late last week, the city health department said. 
No deaths have been tied to the outbreak so far, but Legionnaires’ can be deadly. 
An outbreak in Central Harlem last year infected more than 100 people over the course of several weeks and killed seven. 
City health officials are emphasizing that Legionnaires’ is treatable with antibiotics when it’s caught early. 
 Every case that we are able to get early is another case that we can potentially treat,” Dr. 
Alister Martin, the city health commissioner, said at a virtual town hall on the Legionnaires’ cluster Monday evening. 
Cases have been identified in the ZIP codes 10028, 10128, and 10075  a swath of the Upper East Side extending from Central Park to the East River. 
City health officials are urging anyone who lives in the area or has visited since late June to keep an eye out for signs of Legionnaires' and to seek medical attention as soon as possible. 
Symptoms can include fever, chills, muscle aches, cough, difficulty breathing, fatigue and diarrhea, according to the city health department. 
Martin said the case count keeps ticking up, in part, because healthcare providers have been advised to test for the disease and New Yorkers who might have been exposed have been advised to visit the doctor and ask to get tested if they start to get sick. 
“That case count is a sign of the system working, right?” 
Martin said. 
Legionnaires’ disease is not contagious and city health officials say this cluster is likely caused by a cooling tower in the area spewing mist containing Legionella bacteria into the atmosphere. 
City health officials said some who are being diagnosed now might have inhaled that bacteria before the outbreak was identified and the city began the work of trying to contain it. 
It can take anywhere from two days to two weeks for Legionnaires’ symptoms to show up after exposure, according to the U.S. 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 
Health department staffers are in the process of sampling the water from the 160 or so cooling towers in the affected area so they can be tested for Legionella, city health officials said Monday. 
All of the towers that test positive will be drained, cleaned and disinfected. 
The city has so far conducted initial screenings of about a third of the cooling towers in the area and will finish that work within the next few days, Martin said. 
He said cleaning the towers that tests positive for Legionella is the top priority and should prevent more people from getting sick  but he said identifying the “smoking gun” cooling tower that is the true source of the outbreak could take weeks. 
City health officials are holding an in-person town hall on the Legionnaires’ outbreak Tuesday at 6 p.m. at Church of St. 
Ignatius Loyola  Wallace Hall, at 980 Park Ave. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.9%Caroline Lewis: 2.0%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias8.9%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Caroline Lewis: 3.2%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic4.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Caroline Lewis: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias8.1%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 5.5%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.1%Caroline Lewis: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.0%Caroline Lewis: 3.6%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias11.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Caroline Lewis: 6.6%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 2.8%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 1.2%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Caroline Lewis: 0.9%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.1%Caroline Lewis: 3.5%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority2.1%This article: 2.5%Caroline Lewis: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma2.5%This article: 8.1%Caroline Lewis: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope8.1%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 2.8%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.7%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 3.2%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 2.1%Caroline Lewis: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question2.1%This article: 5.9%Caroline Lewis: 2.7%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.9%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.0%Caroline Lewis: 1.0%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal4.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.7%Caroline Lewis: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.7%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.6%Caroline Lewis: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote3.6%This article: 3.6%Caroline Lewis: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection3.6%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 3.1%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 6.6%Caroline Lewis: 2.6%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination6.6%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

528 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers85%attributed speech77writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageorganization • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageorganization • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageAlister Martin • 18 words • 0.0% coverageorganization • 28 words • 0.0% coverageorganization • 35 words • 100.0% coverageorganization • 19 words • 0.0% coverageAlister Martin • 47 words • 0.0% coverageAlister Martin • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAlister Martin • 2 words • 0.0% coverageorganization • 30 words • 0.0% coverageorganization • 31 words • 0.0% coverageorganization • 22 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 6 words • 0.0% coverageorganization • 34 words • 0.0% coverageorganization • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAlister Martin • 31 words • 0.0% coverageAlister Martin • 43 words • 0.0% coverageorganization • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Alister Martin

66%flagged-word coverage
152 attributed words34% of attributed speech71% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Unattributed Quote-24.7 ptsWriter: 24.7%Alister Martin: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-24.7 ptsWriter: 24.7%Alister Martin: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.