Topic summary
⁠31%3 analyzed articles/videos512 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leadership Change results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 811 hits. Analysis detected 6,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,796 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (11,045 of 16,562 topics). This Leadership Change is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Leadership Change
Topic details
Total words: 7,796
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos