Topic summary
54% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Law Enforcement Investigation results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 913 hits . Analysis detected 6,903 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,008 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,681 of 16,562 topics). This Law Enforcement Investigation is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group. Law Enforcement Investigation
Topic details
Total words: 8,008
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst