Author summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 735 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grace Hills results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Self-Serving Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 282 hits . Analysis detected 2,145 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,205 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,347 of 6,530 authors). This Grace Hills is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group. Grace Hills
Author details
Total words: 2,205
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.1% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.3% 8.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.8% 12.8% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 6.6% 6.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Burden of Proof: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.4% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.6% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst