Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,396 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Latter Day Saints results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 1,024 hits. Analysis detected 7,920 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,684 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,308 of 15,330 topics). This Latter Day Saints is better (less manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Latter Day Saints
Topic details
Total words: 8,684
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.3% percentile
2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.5%7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.9%9.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.9%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.5%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos