BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 38.3% saturation with 209 hits. Analysis detected 989 faulty-reasoning hits from 546 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62.7% and a BS Rank of 69% (6,367 of 20,371 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the article peer group.

When people think of ex-Mormons, what comes to mind is probably liberals who don’t like The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints’ policy stance against gay marriage or ordaining women. 
A new analysis challenges that assumption. 
It shows that people who leave the church lean Republican. 
Looking at a sample of 316 ex-Mormons in the 2024 Pew Religious Landscape Study, the Mormon Metric blog found that 37% were Democrats and 41% Republicans. 
The remainder were independent. 
A decade before that, those numbers skewed the opposite direction. 
The shift could be driven by a change in church leaders’ rhetoric, said Brigham Young University political science professor Quin Monson. 
He’s seen tensions rise between the church and members on the far right. 
The Pew data set doesn’t look at why people are leaving the church, but Monson said its political stance  which he characterizes as center-right  might give someone a reason to leave, or at least, no reason to stay. 
For example, the church strongly urged members to wear masks and get vaccinated during the COVID-19 pandemic. 
And after the LDS Church’s effort to pass California’s Proposition 8 to ban gay marriage in 2008, the church moved to a different strategy  religious freedom and fairness for all. 
It endorsed a 2009 non-discrimination ordinance in Salt Lake City and the 2022 federal Respect for Marriage Act. 
“This church is still not for gay marriage, but in a way that is pretty accommodating, as far as you can be, while not sanctioning it,” Monson said. 
“It's kind of an interesting position, and it doesn't make other religious traditions very happy about the church often.” 
There’s always been a far-right group within the church, but they’re not getting the same validation now as they did in the 1950s, he said. 
There’s been a subtle shift in rhetoric since the church accelerated its efforts in the 60s and 70s to standardize its messaging, tamping down on any partisan edge. 
Ex-Mormons are also less college-educated than people who stay in the LDS Church. 
Alex Bass, the data scientist behind Mormon Metrics, attributes this to larger political forces at work. 
“One of the big movements the last 20 years in politics is a realignment of people who are educated,” he said. 
“Before, the working-class Americans were a lot more likely to support Bill Clinton or Obama.” 
In 2024, President Donald Trump won voters without college degrees 56% to 42%, double the margin of his 2016 victory, according to Pew Research. 
Another finding is that today’s ex-Mormons are more Republican than the people who leave any other religion in the United States. 
In fact, members of other religious groups are moving to the political right while Latter-day Saints are shifting left. 
That tracks with BYU professor Monson’s experience  he said their ties with the Republican Party are weakening. 
“Latter-day Saints are kind of exceptional in the sense that white evangelicals have gone all in on Donald Trump, and Latter-day Saints haven't as much,” he said. 
He’s found in his research that Latter-day Saints take cues from church leaders. 
And while they’re not delivering partisan statements and have vowed political neutrality, he believes the coded messages that come through aren’t very pro-Trump. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.4%Ciara Hulet: 3.4%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias8.4%This article: 4.4%Ciara Hulet: 1.1%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias4.4%This article: 10.1%Ciara Hulet: 3.0%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic10.1%This article: 11.0%Ciara Hulet: 2.1%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic11.0%This article: 7.3%Ciara Hulet: 0.8%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias7.3%This article: 11.2%Ciara Hulet: 2.2%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias11.2%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 5.4%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 1.2%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.6%Ciara Hulet: 1.2%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.3%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 6.3%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 1.7%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.8%Ciara Hulet: 5.4%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias10.8%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 1.7%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Ciara Hulet: 1.0%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error6.8%This article: 3.3%Ciara Hulet: 0.3%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias3.3%This article: 4.9%Ciara Hulet: 1.4%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 1.1%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 2.6%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.6%Ciara Hulet: 1.3%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias1.6%This article: 1.8%Ciara Hulet: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect1.8%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.0%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.2%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.4%Ciara Hulet: 3.6%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority2.4%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 2.3%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 1.0%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.7%Ciara Hulet: 6.6%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization13.7%This article: 3.1%Ciara Hulet: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring3.1%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.7%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.2%Ciara Hulet: 5.6%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion4.2%This article: 1.1%Ciara Hulet: 0.7%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question1.1%This article: 22.0%Ciara Hulet: 5.0%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)22.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.2%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.4%Ciara Hulet: 0.6%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division4.4%This article: 5.7%Ciara Hulet: 5.8%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal5.7%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 38.3%Ciara Hulet: 1.7%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)38.3%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.3%KUER: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.5%KUER: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.8%KUER: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 5.6%KUER: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.2%KUER: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.1%KUER: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ciara Hulet: 0.2%KUER: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

546 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers43%attributed speech313writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageQuin Monson • 21 words • 0.0% coverageQuin Monson • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageQuin Monson • 28 words • 0.0% coverageQuin Monson • 19 words • 0.0% coverageQuin Monson • 25 words • 0.0% coverageQuin Monson • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Bass • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Bass • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageQuin Monson • 27 words • 0.0% coverageQuin Monson • 13 words • 0.0% coverageQuin Monson • 23 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Quin Monson

86%flagged-word coverage
197 attributed words85% of attributed speech93% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.