Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video339.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quin Monson results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Hindsight Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 34.1% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 673.33 faulty-reasoning hits from 339.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (23,031 of 26,717 speakers). This Quin Monson is better (less manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group.
Quin Monson
Speaker details
Total words: 339.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510013.8% percentile
11.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos339.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos