Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,436 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Civility results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 781 hits. Analysis detected 4,813 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,308 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,426 of 37,536 keywords). This Political Civility is worse (more manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Political Civility
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
54%Political Civility (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,308
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510053.6% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 18.1%18.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos