Topic summary
⁠43%5 analyzed articles/videos2,723 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labour Party results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 2,915 hits. Analysis detected 23,367 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,339 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,629 of 16,562 topics). This Labour Party is better (less manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Labour Party
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510029.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles22.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.1%13.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos