Topic summary
⁠59%3 analyzed articles/videos1,946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labor Force Participation results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 1,557 hits. Analysis detected 10,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,414 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,648 of 16,446 topics). This Labor Force Participation is better (less manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group.
Labor Force Participation
Topic details
Total words: 11,414
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.6%13.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos