Topic summary
⁠65%2 analyzed articles/videos930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Reform results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 834 hits. Analysis detected 6,725 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,518 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,720 of 16,559 topics). This Judicial Reform is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Judicial Reform
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,518
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 11.1%11.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos