Topic summary
33% 3 analyzed articles/videos 8,667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jewish History results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 5,118 hits . Analysis detected 26,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,001 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,529 of 16,558 topics). This Jewish History is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group. Jewish History
Topic details
Total words: 26,001
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles26K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 19.7% 19.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 13.4% 13.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst