Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeffrey Epstein Scandal results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 3,883 hits. Analysis detected 27,695 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,768 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,275 of 15,753 topics). This Jeffrey Epstein Scandal is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Jeffrey Epstein Scandal
Topic details
Total words: 13,768
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.9% percentile
4.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 28.2%28.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 21.0%21.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 17.4%17.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.1%14.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.6%26.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.6%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos