Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Jalen Brunson results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 723 hits. Analysis detected 4,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,600 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Jalen Brunson is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jalen Brunson
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,600
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos