Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,957 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel Attacks Lebanon results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 1,305 hits. Analysis detected 8,457 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,384 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (10,041 of 16,558 topics). This Israel Attacks Lebanon is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Israel Attacks Lebanon
Topic details
Total words: 9,384
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.9%13.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos