Topic summary
⁠1%1 analyzed article/video212 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Intergovernmental Agreements results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 2.5% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 18 faulty-reasoning hits from 636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (15,608 of 16,562 topics). This Intergovernmental Agreements is better (less manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group.
Intergovernmental Agreements
Topic details
Total words: 636
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

6% percentile
02550751005.8% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles636 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–5%
0.0%1%2%3%4%5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%1%1%2%2%3%3%4%4%5%5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos