Topic summary
⁠65%4 analyzed articles/videos2,485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Insider Trading results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 1,306 hits. Analysis detected 11,823 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,928 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,263 of 16,562 topics). This Insider Trading is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group.
Insider Trading
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,928
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.5%16.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.2%11.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.1%11.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.0%16.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos