Topic summary
29% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,035 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immigration And Customs Enforcement results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 2,384 hits . Analysis detected 17,085 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,549 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 18% (12,632 of 15,398 topics). This Immigration And Customs Enforcement is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group. Immigration And Customs Enforcement
Topic details
Total words: 19,549
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles19.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.2% 12.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst