Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,600 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Illinois results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 1,209 hits. Analysis detected 8,859 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,091 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (5,941 of 15,447 topics). This Illinois is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Illinois
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,091
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.5% percentile
3.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.9%19.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.5%7.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 18.8%18.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 9.5%9.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.5%16.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos