Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leigh Giangreco results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 801 hits . Analysis detected 3,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,322 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of â 87% (910 of 6,628 authors). This Leigh Giangreco is worse (more manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group. Leigh Giangreco
Author details
Total words: 2,322
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.3% percentile 5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.2% 16.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 34.5% 34.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 10.7% 10.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 12.1% 12.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 8.7% 8.7% Representativeness Heuris⌠Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 34.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.9%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 12.1%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst