Topic summary
89%3 analyzed articles/videos1,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ice Tactics results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 961 hits. Analysis detected 8,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,828 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 51% (8,184 of 16,562 topics). This Ice Tactics is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Ice Tactics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,828
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.6% percentile
3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.4%11.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.1%14.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.1%11.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate