Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jeremy Wallace results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 381 hits. Analysis detected 2,630 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,659 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,363 authors). This Jeremy Wallace is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jeremy Wallace
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Jeremy Wallace (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,659
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 23.0%23.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 18.1%18.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 12.7%12.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.7%7.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 12.7%12.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 23.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 18.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 12.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Author 12.7%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 11.6%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 2.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos