Topic summary
54%3 analyzed articles/videos1,035 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ice Custody Deaths results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 1,073 hits. Analysis detected 5,888 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,294 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 56% (7,299 of 16,562 topics). This Ice Custody Deaths is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Ice Custody Deaths
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.3%20.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.5%8.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate