Topic summary
⁠57%4 analyzed articles/videos815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Housing Market Trends results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 947 hits. Analysis detected 7,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,530 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,451 of 16,562 topics). This Housing Market Trends is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Housing Market Trends
Topic details
Total words: 8,530
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.9%6.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos