Topic summary
70%4 analyzed articles/videos516 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hotels results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 1,310 hits. Analysis detected 7,177 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,584 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 58% (6,616 of 15,447 topics). This Hotels is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Hotels
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,584
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.2% percentile
3.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 23.5%23.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.4%14.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.0%15.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 23.5%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Horn Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate