Author summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos6,291 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsey Galloway results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 6,111 hits. Analysis detected 37,360 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,428 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,093 of 6,138 authors). This Lindsey Galloway is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Lindsey Galloway
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
50%Lindsey Galloway (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 33,428
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510049.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles33.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.9%8.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 18.3%18.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.7%5.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 11.7%11.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Author 18.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate