Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos749 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Homeowners Associations results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 303 hits. Analysis detected 3,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,143 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,133 of 15,780 topics). This Homeowners Associations is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Homeowners Associations
Topic details
Total words: 4,143
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510029.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos