KUER0%

HOAs and grass removal can coexist. This St. George yard shows it off 21%

By David Condos0%

4/23/2026, 8:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 1,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 749 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.2% and a BS Rank of 21% (17,287 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 79.00% of the article peer group.

Trase Taggart’s yard is an open-air buffet. 
Hummingbirds dart in to collect nectar from red yucca blossoms. 
Goldfinches peck at seeds growing on native wildflowers. 
And Taggart’s dog, Dusty, munches on one of his favorite treats  fresh peas from a vegetable bed. 
Creating this edible oasis wasn’t simple. 
Homeowners associations often have rules prioritizing uniform, manicured lawns. 
Like many homes in St. 
George, Taggart’s is part of an HOA. 
“It’s not just one homeowner deciding to do it on their private property, which would be so much easier,” he said. 
“You are involved with the community here.” 
That created some complications when Taggart, a retired science teacher, decided to replace a small plot of grass in his front yard with water-efficient desert landscaping. 
So a few years ago, he became HOA board president and eventually convinced all 40-odd homes in his neighborhood to remove their lawns together. 
The project not only conserved water, he said, but also saved so much on lawn care costs that it cut the HOA’s monthly expenses in half. 
Between those savings and a rebate from the Washington County Water Conservancy District, the association was able to pay off the grass replacement last year. 
And Taggart is happy to pass on what he’s learned. 
His yard will be featured during the April Parade of Gardens hosted by Conserve Southwest Utah and the conservancy district. 
“I can show people that, ‘Hey, you can do it,” Taggart said. 
“It’s possible to have some beautiful flowering plants and some beautiful vegetable and herb gardens and still deal with the blazing sun.” 
Nearly half of the water used in fast-growing Washington County goes to landscapes, said district conservation manager Doug Bennett. 
That makes it vital to find ways to use less, especially in a dry year like this. 
A few years ago, his team assessed the county’s urban grass, and it estimated that around 40% of local lawns were purely ornamental. 
HOA rules can make it hard  or impossible  for residents to ditch that grass. 
“Change is always difficult,” Bennett said. 
“It’s even more difficult when you have these extra layers of bureaucracy.” 
The district can’t accept a grass removal rebate application from someone if the HOA controls their yard and does not approve the change. 
That can cause a lot of confusion for homeowners. 
“Imagine how perplexing it is,” Bennett said. 
“Sometimes these people have been living there for five or more years. 
They apply to our program, and the first time they learn that they don’t actually own that land is when we come back and say, ‘Hey, that’s not part of your parcel.’” 
Some developments, like St. 
George’s Sun River, have helped homeowners conserve by collecting grass removal rebate applications at the neighborhood office. 
But other HOA boards have become so resistant, Bennett said, that they create obstacles. 
For homes like Taggart’s, where the yard is classified as the HOA’s limited common space, there’s not much a homeowner can do if their board doesn’t give them the green light. 
While some of Taggart’s neighbors were initially hesitant to leave their lawns behind, he said, open communication helped get them on board. 
“We were empathetic, and we listened and we understood their concerns, but at the same time, we were looking at what was best for the community,” he said. 
“Then as time went on, those feelings changed.” 
For residents who own their lawns but have an HOA agreement that restricts what they can do, Utah allows them some rights. 
A 2025 law says an HOA can’t prohibit homeowners from having low-irrigation landscaping. 
Another law allows HOA residents to reduce lawn irrigation during drought. 
There’s also a law that extends protections to condo owners. 
While it’s not the water district’s job to enforce laws, Bennett said he doesn’t hesitate to send HOAs a letter offering to educate their board on what the statutes mean. 
There have already been signs pointing to the potential impact of increasing conservation in HOA neighborhoods, Bennett said. 
Washington County residents have removed more than 3 million square feet of grass through the rebate program since it launched in late 2022, and 27% of that has been in HOAs. 
“If we can get homeowners associations engaged, or increase their engagement, I think we have the potential to dramatically increase the water savings that are coming out of these transformation programs,” Bennett said. 
“There’s so much untapped potential.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.1%David Condos: 3.1%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 1.8%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%David Condos: 3.0%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic2.1%This article: 0.9%David Condos: 0.7%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.9%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.6%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%David Condos: 2.5%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias7.5%This article: 4.5%David Condos: 7.5%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect4.5%This article: 6.4%David Condos: 2.2%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion6.4%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 1.0%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.4%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.1%David Condos: 5.8%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias9.1%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 5.7%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%David Condos: 6.8%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias7.3%This article: 7.2%David Condos: 1.4%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.8%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.4%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%David Condos: 1.2%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.4%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%David Condos: 1.0%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect1.3%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 1.8%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.4%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.3%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.6%David Condos: 5.6%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority13.6%This article: 6.3%David Condos: 1.5%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma6.3%This article: 4.4%David Condos: 2.3%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope4.4%This article: 3.7%David Condos: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning3.7%This article: 3.9%David Condos: 2.6%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization3.9%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.2%David Condos: 0.5%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon3.2%This article: 7.7%David Condos: 5.3%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion7.7%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.6%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 11.2%David Condos: 2.9%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.2%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.4%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.5%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.3%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.5%David Condos: 2.1%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal7.5%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.1%David Condos: 1.0%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.1%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.9%David Condos: 0.4%KUER: 0.8%Unattributed Quote10.9%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.4%KUER: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 26.7%David Condos: 1.8%KUER: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice26.7%This article: 1.6%David Condos: 2.5%KUER: 1.6%Indoctrination1.6%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 2.1%KUER: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.4%KUER: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%David Condos: 0.5%KUER: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.0%

749 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers39%attributed speech456writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWashington County Water Conservancy District • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageTaggart • 12 words • 100.0% coverageTaggart • 22 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Bennett • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageDoug Bennett • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageDoug Bennett • 6 words • 100.0% coverageDoug Bennett • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWashington County Water Conservancy District • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Bennett • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Bennett • 12 words • 100.0% coverageDoug Bennett • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Bennett • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Bennett • 30 words • 100.0% coverageDoug Bennett • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageDoug Bennett • 33 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Bennett • 5 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Doug Bennett

100%flagged-word coverage
211 attributed words72% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Biased Writer Voice-40.4 ptsWriter: 42.8%Doug Bennett: 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product +14.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Doug Bennett: 14.2%14.2%Unattributed Quote-5.5 ptsWriter: 14.0%Doug Bennett: 8.5%8.5%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.