Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video166.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doug Bennett results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 52.5 hits. Analysis detected 246.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 166.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (22,611 of 28,364 speakers). This Doug Bennett is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Doug Bennett
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 166.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

20% percentile
025507510020.3% percentile
14.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos166.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 28.0%28.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.0%14.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos