Topic summary
70% 32 analyzed articles/videos 20,306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drought results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 7,460 hits . Analysis detected 70,532 faulty-reasoning hits from 93,723 analyzed words across 31 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (14,533 of 15,365 topics). This Drought is better (less manipulative) than 94.60% of the peer group. Drought
Topic details
Total words: 93,723
Article count: 31
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.4% percentile 1.4% BS Score31 analyzed articles93.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst