Topic summary
⁠93%5 analyzed articles/videos2,352 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Home Security results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 28.7% saturation with 3,187 hits. Analysis detected 16,067 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,115 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,328 of 16,559 topics). This Home Security is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Home Security
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
3.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 28.7%28.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.0%12.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 28.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos