Topic summary
71% 23 analyzed articles/videos 12,559 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hollywood results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 6,200 hits . Analysis detected 70,740 faulty-reasoning hits from 69,258 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (13,295 of 16,491 topics). This Hollywood is better (less manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group. Hollywood
Topic details
Total words: 69,258
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score23 analyzed articles69.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.6% 5.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst