Hugh Jackman and Sutton Foster's romance 'hits roadblock' as the Aussie actor's new girlfriend finds herself relating to his ex-wife: 'She's starting to understand how Deb felt' 72%

By Marta Jary0%

6/16/2026, 10:38:37 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Anecdotal, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41.7% saturation with 211 hits. Analysis detected 1,253 faulty-reasoning hits from 506 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 63.9% and a BS Rank of 72% (6,331 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the article peer group.

Hugh Jackman and Sutton Foster are struggling to strike a work-life balance as their new romance blossoms, according to a new report. 
The couple, who went public with their relationship last year, are lacking 'quality time together' and have 'hit a major roadblock', an insider told Woman's Day this week. 
Jackman's full slate of work commitments has given Foster some empathy for what Hugh's former wife Deborra-Lee Furness may have experienced in their marriage, the source alleges. 
'Hugh's a workaholic and she's starting to understand how lonely Deb must have felt at times,' the insider told the publication. 
'Sutton's finding it hard to be by Hugh's side at so many events and he invites her to every single one,' the insider continued. 
Jackman, 57, has had a number of film projects in the works. 
In addition to his recent starring roles in The Sheep Detectives and The Death of Robin Hood, the Australian actor is slated for the lead in the Treasure Island remake. 
He will play pirate Long John Silver in the Ridley Scott film, which also stars Bill Skarsgard and Jodie Comer. 
Hugh's relationship with the Younger actress, 51, has been the centre of scrutiny since they made it public last January. 
The Wolverine star was recently slammed by his own fans for posting a loved-up photo with girlfriend Foster at the premiere of his new film. 
Posting to Instagram, Jackman uploaded a smiling snap alongside his girlfriend at AMC Lincoln Square 13 in New York, adding the caption: 'And we're off to the premiere of Death of Robin Hood.' 
Jackman's full slate of work commitments has given Foster some empathy for what Hugh's former wife, Deborra-Lee Furness, may have experienced in their marriage, according to a source. 
Above, Jackman and Furness at the 2023 Met Gala 
Jackman was also slammed for attending this year's Met Gala in New York City with Foster 
In the image, a beaming Hugh was seen wrapping his arm around the waist of his lover, as she ecstatically threw one arm up in the air. 
'I see your pics I think of how heartbroken Deb must be,' one user wrote. 
Another added: 'This is so cringy.' 
'Bro, stop posting pictures with her. 
Literally no one supports this relationship,' someone else commented. 
Last month, Jackman was also slammed for attending this year's Met Gala in New York City with Foster. 
The actor's shocking move was seen as a brutal final blow to his ex-wife when they arrived at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, tenderly holding hands as they posed for photos. 
The actor finalised his divorce from Furness last June, after 27 years of marriage, while his romance with Foster began in late 2024, following their starring roles in Broadway's 2021 revival of The Music Man. 
Jackman and his ex-wife previously attended multiple Met Galas, with their last joint appearance being in 2023. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.1%Marta Jary: 3.7%Daily Mail: 2.7%Confirmation Bias11.1%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Marta Jary: 1.1%Daily Mail: 2.8%Availability Heuristic5.5%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 5.3%Marta Jary: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Marta Jary: 6.8%Daily Mail: 6.9%Framing Effect5.3%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 2.4%Daily Mail: 2.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Marta Jary: 0.5%Daily Mail: 1.1%Pessimism Bias3.0%This article: 41.7%Marta Jary: 16.3%Daily Mail: 10.9%Negativity Bias41.7%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 2.0%Daily Mail: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Marta Jary: 2.5%Daily Mail: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error5.3%This article: 10.3%Marta Jary: 1.3%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias10.3%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Marta Jary: 1.9%Daily Mail: 5.0%Halo Effect5.3%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.5%Marta Jary: 2.5%Daily Mail: 1.7%Recency Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.3%Marta Jary: 1.5%Daily Mail: 3.0%Appeal to Authority4.3%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 1.4%Daily Mail: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.5%Marta Jary: 8.2%Daily Mail: 3.9%Hasty Generalization10.5%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 13.4%Marta Jary: 2.6%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon13.4%This article: 7.3%Marta Jary: 6.1%Daily Mail: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion7.3%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 23.9%Marta Jary: 3.4%Daily Mail: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)23.9%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 24.9%Marta Jary: 7.5%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal24.9%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 18.8%Marta Jary: 2.4%Daily Mail: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)18.8%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 32.4%Marta Jary: 10.9%Daily Mail: 3.3%Unattributed Quote32.4%This article: 1.2%Marta Jary: 2.6%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection1.2%This article: 10.5%Marta Jary: 4.0%Daily Mail: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice10.5%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marta Jary: 0.8%Daily Mail: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

506 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker6.5%attributed speech473writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageHugh Jackman • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Hugh Jackman

0%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words100% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Unattributed Quote-34.7 ptsWriter: 34.7%Hugh Jackman: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-11.2 ptsWriter: 11.2%Hugh Jackman: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.3 ptsWriter: 1.3%Hugh Jackman: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.