Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Celebrity Romance results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Unattributed Quote, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 602 hits. Analysis detected 2,973 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Celebrity Romance is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Celebrity Romance
Topic details
Total words: 2,024
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 15.8%15.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 29.7%29.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 13.9%13.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.1%16.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 29.7%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos